Knowledge

preparation of a proctored (written) exam: Step 3

The findings of step 1 and 2 induce some further examination of information. That went a bit longely. It is shown below. After that some paragraphs of short summaries of the examined terms will be given:


Information is a [part of knowledge | part of the knowledge] of the [[sending knowledge storage]]. It is released from the [[knowledge]] of the sending knowledge storage, respectively - to be more specific - released from the [[the sender's context]].

Often, the [[sent information]] can be conceived by the [[sender]] without any difficulties; but if his/her own knowledge changed meanwhile he/she cannot conceive all pieces of the information anymore, although he/she sent it by himself/herself. <==> Every single [[recipient]] [recipient dependent conceivability | conceives the information differently from each other].

A recipient can be someone/something else than the sender - although both ones have the whole same [[knowledge storage]], i.e. being for example the same individual. That's true, if the knowledge storage itself - i.e. it [[content]] - changed over time.

"Every single recipient conceives the information differently from each other" (see above). A sender gives an information a determined [[meaning]], i.e. a determined content. By [parameter | parameters], related to text for example by choice of words and word order in one or more sentences, that content gets [specificating | specified]: constricted, expanded (-- related to a given base form/[[archetype]]?), gets related, respectively: a [[context]] gets generated, e.g. in this writing:

Knowledge interacts with the sender, knowledge interacts with the recipient, [information transmission | information gets transmitted], parameters affect information, as well as the archetype has an effect to the information. The sender influences (the choice of) the archetype and the parameters, and lastly: Parameters and archetype are [a part of knowledge | parts of the knowledge].

For the sender, the meaning of these parameters can change over time. It cannot be debarred that anyone of the parameters completely loses meaning for the sender. Contingent on that, later he possibly doesn't recognize the presence of that parameter anymore. (- For him/her in the role of the recipient, it gets irrelevant relatively to the [expected information]: The parameter gets missed <==> [removal of parameters on recipient's site | filtered out]. => Thus, that parameter hasn't got any effect to the [information receipt | receipt information] anymore - neither in a relating, nor in a constricting nor expanding manner.

"Expected information": Parameters one got yet, already specify - from the recipient's point of view - the [possible sendable information | possible sendable] information so far, that - from the recipient's point of view - it cannot be any but the expected one anymore. I.e. the recipient recognizes any further parameters related to the sent information as irrelevant respectively insignificant. He/She filters them out.

to be continued...
<<

---

[locally referred by: ./. ]

posted by wrs @ 00:42 0 comments

preparation of a proctored (written) exam: Step 2

Due to the findings in Step 1 I conclude, that data are less than atoms of knowledge and less than knowledge [mathematical-AND] data is less than nodes of information and less than information as well as less than knowledge – at what I come to the insight, that atoms of knowledge and nodes of information have to be considered the same.

Due to the findings in Step 1 I conclude, atoms of knowledge to be more than data, but less than knowledge. I come to the insight, that atoms of knowledge and nodes of information have to be considered the same.

Due to the findings in Step 1 I conclude, that knowledge has to be considered as more than atoms of knowledge, more than data, and more than information. Knowingly, I dissent the previous predication, knowledge and information, in principle, were the same.

Node of information: see "atom of knowledge" vs "node of information".

Atom of knowledge: see "atom of knowledge" vs "node of information".

Due to the findings in Step 1 I conclude, that information is more than a node of information but less than knowledge. Knowingly, I dissent to the previous predication, knowledge and information, in principle, were the same.

Due to the findings in Step 1 I conclude, that "atom of knowledge" and "node of information" have to be considered the same.<<

---

[locally referred by: preparation of a proctored (written) exam: Step 3]

posted by wrs @ 00:16 0 comments

preparation of a proctored (written) exam: Step 1

I assume data to be less than atoms of knowledge and less than knowledge,  atoms of knowledge to be more than data, but less than knowledge, and  knowledge to be more than atoms of knowledge and to be more than data as well. I assume that, in principle, knowledge and information are identical.

I assume that, in principle, knowledge and information. both are the same. Information is knowledge under way. Knowledge is in the head of a human being, respectively in a knowledge storage.

Knowledge in motion: Pressed out of, "wrung out" of the brains – more precisely: out of the knowledge storage – is knowledge information. A piece of its knowledge. On the journey. Till it gets conceived and placed into one knowledge, again.

One knowledge: all the nodes of knowledge including their context of a knowledge storage. – Compare to information is knowledge in motion.

Knowledge storage: not defined. Possibly the same as one knowledge.

Node of knowledge: not defined. Possibly the same as an atom of knowledge.

Information: I assume that, in principle, knowledge and information are identical.<<

---

[locally referred by: preparation of a proctored (written) exam: Step 2, preparation of a proctored (written) exam: Step 3]

posted by wrs @ 00:16 0 comments